Sunday, June 25, 2017

How I Learned to Love My Body Hair

I'm a hairy person. I don't really remember a time when I wasn't. By nine or ten years old, my legs were vertical forests. I wore shorts to school every chance I got. Other kids were mystified by my premature leg hair: did I shampoo it? Did it ever tangle? What did the breeze feel like on my legs?

I was proud.

That changed somewhere around age thirteen, when my pubescent insecurities were especially swollen and tender. A well-meaning loved one, who happened to be a bit further along the stream of adolescence, told me that body hair was a source of shame. The only people who had hairy legs were men, and I wasn't one of those. In order to fit in and be a "normal" girl as I transferred to a new middle school, I had to shave.

So I did. After an hour and two single-blade Bic razors, my legs were smooth (if a little bloody). I proudly felt like I was growing up, though I also felt a heavy sense of loss. Without my hair, I was paradoxically more a "woman" and less a "child."

I continued shaving for years. I would spend an hour in the shower every weekend, trying my hardest to obtain the satiny smooth legs all my female classmates had. At several points, I even used Nair on my arms (my arms!). I had become increasingly ashamed of my own body.

During a routine sports physical toward the end of high school, a clinician noticed my hair. She quickly recommended that I be tested for PCOS, or poly-cystic ovarian syndrome. After the tests came back negative, I instead received an official diagnosis of hirsutism. This was an enormous blow to my teenaged ego: how was I supposed to be a real and beautiful woman if I looked like a werewolf?

Somewhere along the way, though, I realized that beauty, femininity, and body hair were not mutually exclusive. I wish I could point to a singular epiphany, but in reality, I think I just got tired of shaving my legs. I stopped about a year ago, at first as a sort of "screw you" to the patriarchal world outside Wellesley. I wanted to spend my time writing, or playing the guitar, or reading. I didn't want to be forced into diverting my precious attention to my appearance. Plus, it was wintertime so my legs would be mostly, safely hidden. Before long, though, spring reared its colorful head, daring me to maintain the hair that had populated my legs. I could only wear pants for so long.

I stubbornly decided to try not giving a fuck.

The first day I wore a knee-length dress to work, I was beyond uncomfortable. Everyone in my male-dominated workplace could see my hair, exposed and vulnerable. But I stuck it out. Shaving was no longer worthwhile. I hated feeling obligated to use my time in pursuit of an arbitrary beauty standard, one which I hadn't chosen for myself. I hated spending money on razors. I hated being itchy. And I was beginning to enjoy the defiant feeling that grew along with my body hair. I found amusement in each stolen glance at my legs. I could tell that, for a lot of eyes, my swishy dresses and body hair didn't fit into the visual prototype of "feminine."

I loved that.

Months later, my leg hair is still dense. I recently epilated my armpits, an extraordinarily painful and familiar process. I don't regret either decision. As I grow outside the Wellesley bubble, I feel increasingly empowered to make deliberate choices about my appearance. I seldom wear makeup, but when I do, it's because I want to. Following that same logic, I'm confident that if I shave again, I'll do so for my own motivations, and not for anyone else.

There are still plenty of days when I wonder how it would feel to have barren legs, but I've reached a point where my time and money seem too valuable to waste on shaving. My leg hair has become a symbol of my strength, my confidence, and my womanhood. I've reclaimed that loss for my insecure thirteen-year-old self. For the first time in my life, I can say that I'm genuinely unapologetic for my human body and all its hairy splendor.

As I wrap this up, I'm curious to hear other perspectives on grooming, especially as it pertains to gender. Do you shave/wax/epilate/etc.? What are your motivations for/against doing so? Have these changed over time?

Leave a comment and we'll have a conversation.

Thank you for reading this far!

Friday, June 16, 2017

A Taste of Sadness


- "A Taste of Sadness" by Walter Wanderley, from Rain Forest (1966)

Tuesday, June 13, 2017

The Emperor's New Clothes

Way back in the nineteenth century, Hans Christian Andersen wrote a short story called "The Emperor's New Clothes." (If you're interested, the English translation can be found here.)

The basic vibe, in case you're not inclined to read it, is that these weavers promise to produce magic clothes for an emperor. The weavers tell him that his clothes will appear invisible to anyone who's unworthy. Then the weavers commit some fantastic object-work, pretending to clothe the emperor without actually clothing him. (These weavers probably would have been great at improv. Perhaps they were court jesters in disguise?)

The Emperor, as illustrated by Vilhelm Pedersen

As you might have guessed, their little experiment yields some unsettling results: no one wants to tell the emperor he's naked, because they're afraid he'll condemn them.

Sound familiar?

Jeff Sessions's testimony before the Senate Intelligence Committee was like a sad, Billy Wilder sequel to that story. The way he squirmed in his seat, equivocating about laws and duties...it was clear he knew he was wrong. Furthermore, I suspect he knows that Trump is wrong, toosurely Jeff Sessions isn't that dumb. But throughout his testimony, I had a tingling suspicion that, no matter what happens, Sessions will take the fall for Trump. He is going down with that ship, no matter what the price.

I'm not saying Sessions didn't break the law, or that his politics aren't repugnant. What I am saying is that Sessions will stop at nothing to protect Trump, even if it means obstructing federal investigations. This frightens me. Is our democracy really so broken that we can't elect leaders who support us?

I don't think so.

I think that, speaking generally, the Russian interference in our 2016 presidential election was an attempt to undermine American faith in our democracy. It's not a perfect system, of course. But if this election has taught us anything, it's that we need to charge unflinchingly ahead within the framework of our existing system. We need to vote, and we need to elect leaders who want us to vote, too. We need leaders who will listen to their constituents and who will accordingly challenge the structure of our government. We need leaders who will speak truth to power, who will modestly admit their shortcomings, who will always strive for a better country.

Throughout this whole post, however, I'm circling the question I don't have an answer to: what about the damn weavers? What's their role in this? Instinct tells me that these weavers are heroes, for several reasons:
  1. They outsmart the all-powerful emperor.
  2. They draw attention to the societal inclination to affirm authority figures.
  3. They're really good at pretending to weave.
Still, I can't place them in the context of our current political situation. Are our weavers the Russian government? Or maybe all the people who neglected to vote? Or maybe even the old white men who wrote our Constitution so long ago? Most of these figures aren't heroes.

Then again, maybe it's time to revise our conceptions of fairy tales.

Tuesday, June 6, 2017

Lightning Strikes

Baking banana bread and listening to this while my neighbor gets down to Bright Eyes below my window.


- "Lightning Strikes" by Klaus Nomi, from Klaus Nomi (1981)