I was glossing over this poem by Bukowski today, and thinking about how much I dislike his romanticization of addiction and suffering as necessary to the creative process, when not ten minutes later I encountered a similar sentiment from recently-sober filmmaker Lars von Trier. Before I get ahead of myself, here is the poem in question:
"The Replacements"
Jack London drinking his life away while
writing of strange and heroic men.
Eugene O'Neill drinking himself oblivious
while writing his dark and poetic
works.
now our moderns
lecture at universities
in tie and suit,
the little boys soberly studious,
the little girls with glazed eyes
looking
up,
the lawns so green, the books so dull,
the life so dying of
thirst.
-Charles Bukowski, from
Pleasures of the Damned: Poems, 1951-1993
Now, Bukowski likely held a nuanced view of addiction, I'm not arguing otherwise. But, I think the notion that accomplished and capable artists are made great by their suffering, whether that be mental illness, or addiction, or abuse...it just seems ridiculous to me. For every Plath or van Gogh, there are hundreds of individuals with similar experiences who will never come close to fulfilling their potential. These artists were great in spite of, not because of, their ailments.
So. It only makes sense that I was more than a little concerned when I read
this article in which von Trier says that "There is no creative expression of artistic value that has ever been
produced by ex-drunkards and ex-drug-addicts. Who the hell would bother
with a Rolling Stones without booze or with a Jimi Hendrix without
heroin?" Obviously, the man has every right to express concern over how his substance use (or lack thereof) might affect his artistic process, but I find his claim to be absurd. Look at Tom Waits, or James Ellroy. I mean, obviously I have little credibility in this discussion, not having ever struggled with or recovered from a serious substance addiction, but I think that to equate creativity with suffering is to limit one's own ability to produce work.
But that's just one girl's opinion.